image from hereYesterday I made a badly flawed post in which I completely misinterpreted what I was commenting on. I did not proof-read before I posted. I apologize for my blunder, and thank freako for pointing it out.
really...
comments and submissions
All comments are welcome.
Please keep it civil, no flames, and no spam.
contact
"When we are in the middle of the paradigm, it is hard to imagine any other paradigm" (Adam Smith).
Please keep it civil, no flames, and no spam.
contact
"When we are in the middle of the paradigm, it is hard to imagine any other paradigm" (Adam Smith).
links
- vancouver condo info
- rob chipman's
- mohican's housing analysis
- condohype
- things by coco
- van re anecdotes
- will wertheim (stats)
- paul b's north van condo's (stats)
- cheap realty
- victoria's truth
- house haunting in victoria
- Santa Barbara Housing Bubble Blog
- real estate talks - BC
- stephen rees on transportation, etc.
- bubblemeter
- wikipedia
- dictionary.com
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(66)
-
▼
November
(30)
- top 10 reasons to visit vancouver
- affordable housing
- snow day
- do you take this blog seriously?
- gotta trust in something
- Richmond construction fee increase
- dissecting bias
- richie the roughneck from red deer
- let's develop stanley park!
- the changing city
- silver lining
- branding vancouver
- third world class
- journalism and spin
- mea culpa
- calculations
- spin
- urban renewal
- living in Squalor
- thanks VHB
- discounting the discounters
- over-priced shitty houses
- comparable?
- old becomes new
- supply and demand
- disconnect?
- The new brave
- old is new...again
- over priced and shitty
- assessed values
-
▼
November
(30)
ask, and get an answer
powered by Answers.com
5 comments:
May I ask which post you're talking about?
Hi woodenhorse,
I wrote about an article that was in The Sun and completely wixed up y mords and mideas.
I interpreted a projection of growth in housing stocks to be a projection of price increases, and ranted and raved about it most foolishly.
I published it when I meant to save it as a draft, and went away. When I came back and read it, I realized my mistake. freako caught it too. I tried to re-write it, but it was too messed up, so I deleted it.
Embarrassed myself, I did. That's what's with the bag over the head. I can't very well rant about the MSM if I am not concise.
I agree...buck up little bear.
I try to make at least one major error in every post, otherwise what fun is it?
I think you can rant all you want about the MSM without being concise. Afterall they aren't paying you are they?
Thanks for the votes of confidence dear readers. I hope my self-flagellation isn't too unseemly. It's really a pre-emptive strike. I figure that if I criticize myself, everyone else will feel sorry for me.
Smug, self-serving and insincere by stealth.
Pope, you are right. I can rant about them. And they are paying me. I'm a kind of Manchurian Candidate - lulling you all to think I'm on your side, but in reality...mwa-ha-ha.
Hang on Derrick, I've got Rupert Murdoch on the other line. What? Yeah, I'm in a conference call with Bub Rainy and Scameron More and More Suckers To Insult and Fleece.
No. No. They think that the water is unfit to drink. Yeah, that's right, we're making bazillions of bucks on bottled water.
They all think Vancouver is world class, but it's really Third World Class. Idiots.
Post a Comment